Year: 2016

What is ‘not’ a significant reason to revise a budget

16th December, 2016

A change of counsel is not a ‘significant reason’ to warrant a revision to a costs budget.   The Judge in Greig v Lauchlan Ch D 07/12/2016 considered the defendant’s application to increase a budget (approved in October 2015) at the PTR, shortly before the imminent 10-day trial, because of a change in Counsel.  …

Read more…

A good but unconstitutional decision?

9th December, 2016

The Court of Appeal in Qader & Others v Esure Services Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 1109 decided that fixed costs no longer apply to RTA portal claims subsequently allocated to the multi-track. The decision is considered by all to be a good decision, but the method of arriving at it was more interesting. The Court…

Read more…

Good reasons found to exceed the budget

6th December, 2016

Roger Wyland QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge in the case of Sony Communications International AB v SSH Communications Security Corporation [2016] EWHC 2985 (Pat) used the Claimant’s costs budget  to assess the Claimant’s costs at the end of the case, where the parties had agreed this process to avoid a detailed assessment.…

Read more…

Jackson’s review of fixed recoverable fees

1st December, 2016

Last week’s announcement of Jackson LJ’s review of the fixed recoverable costs referred to 13 assessors who will assist in the task (click here).  The number of assessors was quietly increased to 14 by the addition of the current chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers.  No doubt it is a sensible move to have…

Read more…

Fixed costs to be extended

24th November, 2016

Lord Justice Jackson will commence a review of options to extend fixed recoverable fees in January 2017 to be completed by end of July. A major expansion of fixed costs is expected in view of his brief to “develop proposals for extending the present civil fixed recoverable costs… to make the costs of going to…

Read more…

The wording of your retainer is important

22nd November, 2016

In the case of Cathal Anthony Lyons v Fox Williams LLP [2016] EWHC 2427 QB the High Court did not agree to the Claimant’s retainer being extended beyond the duties set out in the engagement letter in the absence of clear and unambiguous evidence to the contrary.   Circumstances Professional negligence case Claimant suffered injuries…

Read more…

Banging on about Proportionality

17th November, 2016

It is the big topic when it comes to costs recovery.   Gordon Exall warns it cannot be ignored and lists 8 points to ensure a case is managed proportionately:   Risk assess the case properly before taking it on; Explain the concept and encourage your client to engage in the case; Think, “Can I…

Read more…

Don’t delay requesting a payment on account of costs

10th November, 2016

I bring you a tip from Lesley Graves of Citadel Law, a niche law firm adviser, to improve your cash flow and standard of  expert report you receive; and to reduce complaints from experts of slow settlement of fees: In PI cases, where liability is admitted and evidence disclosed, law firms should request an interim…

Read more…